Stas Bekman wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: >> Stas Bekman wrote: >> >>> Hey Geoff, shouldn't the apache2-rename-unstable branch be nuked? >> >> I'm not sure that you delete branches in svn. probably best to ask on >> the dev list and get input from folks like joe and philippe who grok >> svn better than I do. > > I don't think it has anything to do with the understanding of svn. It's > just that if something is dead why keeping it around? All the changes > from that branch were merged into the trunk anyway, so it doesn't have > any extra value besides the painful memories.
Exactly, once a branch has outlived it's usefuleness, there is nothing wrong with: $> svn delete -m'Merged successfully to trunk/' \ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/branches/apache2-rename-unstable/ -- Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
