Geoffrey Young wrote:
I thought so to, but it looks like we had test cases for 2.1 and greater,
and 2.0.X. the 2.1 cases were removed because > 2.1 was finally brought
into sync with 2.0.X.
in other words, I don't think your change did anything.
on the other hand, chris is getting 2.1-type numbers. this is how it used
to look, for example
- my $cl = have_min_apache_version(2.1) ? 25 : 0;
- my $head_cl = have_min_apache_version(2.1) ? $cl : undef;
so chris is getting 25 instead of 0 and undef, which is how 2.1 used to
report back things. I can't recall a single failure of this test that
wasn't 2.1-specific...
Agreed, yeah, I was kind of confused.
I'm starting to think that ubuntu is taking some major liberties with it's
distribution, but who knows.
YUCK!!
!
so, for that test specifically don't worry about it. I guess. I mean, if
various distributions are going to package httpd but muck with it's innards,
there's not much we can do about it...
Works for me.
So these 2 are taken care of then :)
--
END
------------------------------------------------------------
What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger.
Nothing is impossible.
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/
Senior Developer / Liquidity Services, Inc.
http://www.liquidityservicesinc.com
http://www.liquidation.com
http://www.uksurplus.com
http://www.govliquidation.com
http://www.gowholesale.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
