On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I guess if there are no objections I'll commit it on Monday.
Sounds good to me - I tested the patch out on Win32 with the
Apache-Test tests and also the apreq tests (which involve
some cgi tests), and these worked fine.
Thanks Randy, but did you try removing the < 62 check? It's only different
from the current implementation if that exec trick is used (i.e. if you have
a very long path to perl.exe). So try to s/62/2/ or something like that.
Thanks!
Thanks for pointing that out, Stas - I just did a s/62/2/ in
the check, to force the exec trick, and both the Apache-Test
and apreq tests still all passed.
--
best regards,
randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
