> I think Geoff especially knows more about this, but from > what I understand, httpd-2.2.0 should build and work in > principle under mp2.
yeah, that's the general idea. I think at this point the goal should be - it absolutely compiles under 2.2 - 2.0 functionality is maintained under 2.2 insofar as 2.2 includes the functionality itself - new 2.2 behavor gets added/modified as people get itches and/or tuits unix variants I think we're in good shape. but if win32 needs work then by all means feel free to adjust as necessary. > Two of the problems you describe: > - change Apache.exe to httpd.exe; > - change names of apr and aprutil libs; > look like they may be Win32-specific changes that are > needed; yeah. let's keep win32 (and everyone else) in a good state :) > I'll try to take a look at this in soon. I'm not > sure about the other error of not knowing where the > execuatables are - it may be related to the name change of the apache > executable - I'll also take a look at this. thanks, randy :) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
