Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > David Wheeler wrote: > >> On Jul 31, 2006, at 18:01, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >>> Wny not just pass the $r that we have ? >>> (I agree with the spirit of the patch) >> >> >> Possible memory leak? I mean, is it the same request object across >> requests? Or does the cleanup handler get added for every request? >> >> I just thought that the shift was safest. >> >>> I'll commit a tweaked version tomorrowish unless someone screams. > > After thinking about it more, I like 'shift' better too.
which is also one more step to it being 2.0-groovy (over Apache->request) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
