> Instead of all the ok &= bits I think this'd be clearer if we just did > "return unless X" and then "return 1" at the end, because it tells the > person reading the code that everything afterwards is basically > irrelevant if any one test fails. As it stands, it makes you read the > whole thing.
the way it's written is intentional - if you just return on a single failure you're get into the pattern of failure-install-failure-install until all your prereqs are met. need() behaves this way (list all failures at once) internally, so the current behavior is what A-T users would be expecting. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
