Re: [VOTE] absorb Apache::Reload

[Philippe M. Chiasson]

On 6-Feb-07, at 12:45 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:

hi all :)

in order to transfer maintainershop of Apache::Reload from matt to the



  o grant matt commit bits to Apache::Reload (should he want them)
  o changing PAUSE primary maintainer from MATTS to APML

be the responsibility of our community

taking over the module is not something we are required to do.  but I
think would be goodness for our userbase, as we could eventually serve
Apache2::Reload and Apache::Reload from a single, unified codebase.

mod_perl collective we need to take a formal vote. voting +1 would mean: o importing Apache::Reload from CPAN to our svn repository at the ASF o future Apache::Reload releases (and bugs and integration, etc) would

let me safely unload a module 100% reliably...

+1 on going borg on Apache::Reload

And that would certainly be goodness! Now, if only Perl itself would please

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part