Torsten Foertsch wrote: > to have these 2 patches applied to trunk or to get a statement why they > cannot > be applied?
Something very similar to what you've been doing already ;-) In general, that's the correct approach. Post patches, explanations, test cases that expose the problem, and generally poke people about it. > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93415 This one looks pretty good, and I think it's a cleaner approach to the currently uncorrect one. > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/93466 Also a good patch, with just a few style nits. Sorry for the lag in responding, but like a lot of us, we've got dayjobs that eat up our hacking time. I've seen your patches come in, and I've read thru them quite carefully, rest assured. They have been at the top of my mod_perl queue for some time now, but the difficult part is verifying they are correct without a reproducible test case. I'll see about getting these sorted out this week-end. Thanks again! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philippe M. Chiasson GPG: F9BFE0C2480E7680 1AE53631CB32A107 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
