Torsten Foertsch wrote: > On Wednesday 17 October 2007 18:10, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: >> Yeah, I know. If you ask me, this pnotes behaviour is wrong, but we chose >> to keep it around for historical reasons. It's not a bug if it's documented > > It is a bug. If it is documented it is a documented bug. I was hit by it once > and spent a day or so to find it, really nasty. I cannot agree with > the "historical" reason. If something is wrong it it wrong and it doesn't > matter how long it has been wrong before.
there is a very long thead in the archives about this very thing. my stance is still what I wrote at the bottom here: http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=114987370431251&w=2 in short, we have an obligation to not bork our existing userbase who may have been (perhaps unknowingly) taking advantage of this unique feature of pnotes() for years and years. --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
