Thanks for taking the time to lay out this solid argument Torsten. I wasn't able to duplicate the issue either.
I've resolved https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 by not applying the suggested patch. I think the submitter may have had an odd setup, but there wasn't enough evidence to show what exactly was going wrong so that we could duplicate it. Only 1 more open Apache::Test bug! 2010/4/16 Torsten Förtsch <torsten.foert...@gmx.net>: > On Friday 16 April 2010 04:02:17 Fred Moyer wrote: >> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 >> >> Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that >> the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled >> (current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe move. 5.8.8 does >> not have version.pm bundled, but it is easy enough to install. >> > Sorry, but I don't understand the source of the problem. Is it that EU::MM > uses version numbers of the form 6.06_12? We need at least 6.06, right? > 6.06_01 will do as well, right? > > $ perl -Mversion -le 'my $v1="6.05_99"; my $v2="6.06"; print "less" if > 0+$v1<0+$v2' > less > $ perl -Mversion -le 'my $v1="6.05_99"; my $v2="6.06"; print "less" if > version->new($v1)<version->new($v2)' > less > > $ perl -Mversion -le 'my $v1="6.06"; my $v2="6.06_01"; print "less" if > 0+$v1<0+$v2' > $ perl -Mversion -le 'my $v1="6.06"; my $v2="6.06_01"; print "less" if > version->new($v1)<version->new($v2)' > less > > There is a difference. Without version it is > > 6.05_99<6.06 and 6.06==6.06_01 > > though with version it is > > 6.05_99<6.06 and 6.06<6.06_01 > > But our case is 6.05_99<6.06. Obviously I have missed something. > > Torsten Förtsch > > -- > Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name) > > Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
