Torsten Förtsch wrote on 2011-06-28:
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 00:26:56 Fred Moyer wrote:
>> I am planning to roll some release candidates next week.  I think
>> we've tested against 5.14, and there was the LWP 6.x issue that
>> doesn't seem to be a blocker.  Anything else?
>  Would be nice if I had the httpd 2.4 port ready. But I wouldn't see
> that as a blocker at all.
> 
> A few weeks ago I called for testing with 5.14. There was no reply.
> Optimistically we can take this as "no problems encountered",
> pessimistically as "no one bothered to test". But perhaps a release
> candidate will get more attention (hopefully). Anyway, I think it's time.
> 

I've belatedly got round to testing modperl/trunk with perl-5.14.1 (and 
httpd-2.2.17) on Windows XP (using VS2010).

It builds fine except for a minor wobble from Makefile.PL saying

Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
lib/Apache2/Build.pm line 1725.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at 
lib/Apache2/Build.pm line 1725.
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Note (probably harmless): No library found for /src/modules/perl/.lib

for each of Apache2::Reload and Apache2::SizeLimit. I've not seen that happen 
before but it didn't stop it from building normally otherwise.

It also tests fine except for apache/subprocess tests 2-5, which I *have* seen 
many times before: that's been failing for quite a while now, so shouldn't hold 
up release of 2.0.6. (I really should look into why it's failing one day...)

So it's a +1 from me, FWIW.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org

Reply via email to