On Wednesday, 07 March 2012 11:15:36 Torsten Förtsch wrote: > On Sunday, 04 March 2012 10:29:45 SalusaSecondus wrote: > > Broken behavior: > > 4 threads, 2 free interpreters > > 1: A (1,1) > > 2: A (2,0) > > 3: W > > 4: W > > 1: P (1,1) B > > 2: P (0,2) <-- No broadcast because there was an available interpreter > > prior to this putback. > > 3: A (1,1) > > 3: P (0,2) <-- No broadcast because there was an available interpreter > > prior to this putback. > > (Broken) > > Your analysis seems correct, good catch, thanks!
I committed your change as revision 1299429, thanks. I decided not to construct a test case because the implementation seemed the buggier the more I thought about it. Further, even if I could conceive a test case what would it check? Only the fact that nobody reverts the change because it could only be quite artificial. That would be ridiculous. Torsten Förtsch -- Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name) Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
