On 17 June 2015 at 19:57, Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:27:28PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > >> mod_perl2 (up to and including 2.0.9-RC3) fails to build with GCC 5, >> because the default inline semantics have changed from GNU89 to C99 and >> require changes in mod_perl source. > > Ah, reading my own references properly, it looks like it might be a > bit more complicated than that, and probably only happens when apr and > mod_perl are compiled with different inline semantics. Is that correct? > > Sorry for the confusion. I still think a note somewhere could help...
I was just about to roll the release this evening when I saw this. A minor README update surely doesn't warrant a new RC so I'm prepared to slip the note in now. Is the wording still accurate, given that the situation is more complicated than you first thought? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org
