[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14056427#comment-14056427
 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1073:
---------------------------------------

Probably best to start on the dev list to discuss this first, rather than file 
a JIRA. Yes, HBase is much faster if all the data is in it's cache.

> A memory table in every region is needed?
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-1073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1073
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: jay wong
>
> When a do a group by query.
> We assume that a Region has 30M data.
> 100K row which include 30 kv per row
> And the RT of GroupedAggregateRegionObserver is about 3 sec.
> but most of time. in fact nearly  2.2 sec is spend on RegionScaner scan all 
> the row.
> I have a test.  first time scan all of the data into memory.
> the second time only load the data from memory.
> the RT of GroupedAggregateRegionObserver execute only 0.7s.
> So If a memory table is needed for Phoenix computational intensive scene



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to