GitHub user jfernandosf opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/4

    PHOENIX-1096 Fix for concurreny bug caused by a cached SequenceExpression 
using the same byte[] buffer in multiple threads

    This is a fix for the Upsert...Select issue we ran into when using 
Sequences in the SELECT portion of the statement. We were generating mutations 
with identical row keys because multiple rows were being assigned the same 
sequence number. I tracked this down to the fact that we cache 
SequenceExpression and have a member field byte[] where we store the sequence 
after reading it. This buffer was being written to by multiple threads and so 
there was no guarantee a thread would see the sequence it read and based on 
timing multiple threads would read the same sequence when generating the row 
key for the mutation. 
    
    Moving the buffer to a local variable addresses this issue.
    
    I have also included a test that Samarth and I created to repro the issue 
that is now passing.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jfernandosf/phoenix 3.0

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/4.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #4
    
----
commit dad771fa7be4320a20fb508a495c6478dcca53f6
Author: Jan Fernando <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-07-17T21:35:00Z

    Fix for concurreny bug caused by a cached SequenceExpression using the same 
byte[] buffer in multiple threads to store sequence values by multiple threads 
when processing upsert...select result sets

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to