[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14108126#comment-14108126
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1199:
---------------------------------------
It's certainly open to debate going forward, but we've never verified/confirmed
this in the past. I think it's difficult solely due to lack of control from our
POV. What do you think, [~apurtell]?
But it's definitely a goal to get Russell and others unstuck by doing this:
bq. The issue, I think, is that the phoenix-pig module was only compiled
against the hadoop1 profile. Instead, it should be compiled against both, with
separate jars built and placed in the phoenix-4.1.0-bin/hadoop1 and
phoenix-4.1.0-bin/hadoop2 directories (instead of phoenix-4.1.0-bin/common). In
that case, you'd simply use the hadoop2/phoenix-pig jar with CDH 5.1. This is
likely the case with the phoenix-flume module as well. If someone wants to
volunteer to confirm that, it'd be much appreciated.
> Determine options for Phoenix 4.1.x supporting CDH 5.1
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-1199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1199
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.1
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Attachments: PHOENIX-1199.patch
>
>
> Let's figure out the most painless way of supporting CDH 5.1 for Phoenix 4.1.
> I'm not as concerned with compile-time, as we know we have a dependency on
> HBase 0.98.4 (to fix a deadlock issue). However, this is not a runtime
> dependency. But the lack of the ServerName is going to be a problem at
> runtime. Are there other problematic class references?
> What are our options? Should we try to get something in the next HBase
> release that'll help (making constructors public, for example)? Or can we not
> use ServerName in the Phoenix code? Are the old HBase APIs available still?
> You all would know better than me.
> Or should we just wait for the next patch release from Cloudera and ask
> nicely that they make it more compatible? smile :-)
> [~apurtell], [~stack], [~lhofhansl], [~jesse_yates]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
