[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14172022#comment-14172022
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-1314:
----------------------------------------

[~rajesh23] I meant RegionScanner, sorry. (unless we have multiple column 
families Region == Store as far as this discussion is concerned).
Eventually HFileReaderVx.reseekTo won't do anything if the new key is before 
the current location; but note that that has trickle down to each HFileReader, 
just to be ignored there. HBase is just being nice here, it could have just as 
well thrown an exception.

Why are we seeking to seemingly the same position again? 
(prev=varchar7//LATEST_TIMESTAMP/Maximum/vlen=0/mvcc=0, 
next=varchar7//LATEST_TIMESTAMP/Maximum/vlen=0/mvcc=0)   Do you have multiple 
column families in your case?

I suppose that seeking to the same key or even the same row-key is OK.


> Assertion tripped for skip scan with two unit tests
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-1314
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1314
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.1
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: rajeshbabu
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-1314.patch, PHOENIX-1314_v3.patch, 
> Phoenix-1314_3.0.patch
>
>
> After checking in a pretty sizeable change 
> (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commit;h=d018cc1c6e01d9836de6e67af4f8b91de3269bfd),
>  the assert in SkipScanFilter.setNextCellHint() started getting tripped for 
> the following unit tests: 
> - DeleteIT.testDeleteAllFromTableWithIndexNoAutoCommitNoSalting()
> - MutableIndexIT.testCoveredColumnUpdatesWithLocalIndex()
> The tests seem to pass without this assert (not sure what HBase does if the 
> seek next hint is the same as the current row), but it would be good to get 
> to the bottom of this. Would you mind taking a look, [~rajesh23]? It's 
> possibly related to PHOENIX-1313.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to