Here is my +1.

- verified signing key for src and bin tgzs
- extracted src tgz and ran full integration tests and it passed.
- ran apache-rat check no issues reported.
- installed HBase 1.0.1 in standalone mode and ran examples and no issues.
- loaded some data and created indexes and things are fine.
- created tables with replicas and tested HBase HA it's working fine.
- tested UDFs and things are fine but hadoop jars(needed for dynamically
loading the udf jars) should be placed in phoenix-assembly/target folder in
phoenix home. Raised PHOENIX-1977 clean up it. It's not critical and should
not sink the RC.
- started query server and ran some queries from sqlline-thin command line.
They are fine.
- enabled tracing and ran some queries and checked the trace information
for the queries. It's fine.

Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.



On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 1:11 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
wrote:

> +1. Ran same tests as with 0.98 release.
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I think which version of gpg used is not important, so long as the
> > signatures are valid and can be consumed universally. Likewise with the
> > checksum calculations. I agree that standardizing on this for the project
> > would be helpful for all parties, but until we enforce generating release
> > artifacts in jenkins, I think discrepancies between release managers is
> > acceptable. I do find it startling that there's a difference between
> what's
> > on the tag and what's in the tgz, but since it's not product changes,
> only
> > dev tools, it's not enough to sink the RC.
> >
> > Now for my +1
> >
> > - verified signing key for both tgzs
> > - run with 1.0.1 and checkout of branch-1.0/HEAD in local mode
> > - create table, load example data with psql, list tables and content
> > - start query server and perform similar experiments there; everything
> > works as expected and log levels look good
> > - checked src tgzl with apache-rat:check, and verified no .class, .jar,
> > .orig, ~ files present
> > - build src tgz, UT all pass (with PHOENIX-1963 applied, thanks Gabriel.
> > Missing a close() in test is not bad enough to sink the RC.)
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:10 PM, rajeshb...@apache.org <
> > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> @Gabriel,
> >> bq. The format that the checksums are written in here makes it
> >> impossible to check them with an automated tool, which is a bit of an
> >> issue for me and perhaps a bigger issue for people who count on that
> >> working for all software downloads. Any reason for the change?
> >>
> >> Sorry for this. When I read
> >> https://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html#generate-key this link
> >> I thought it's fine to have install gpg2 or gpg and went to install
> gpg2.
> >> Didn't realize this problem.
> >> Next time make release with gpg.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rajeshbabu.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Here is my +1.
> >> >
> >> > Verified sigs, crcs.
> >> > Run with HBase-1.0.1 local mode.
> >> > Tried the examples.
> >> > checked directory layouts, jars
> >> > checked src tarball contents vs tag
> >> >
> >> > +1 to what Gabriel says.
> >> > Enis
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Gabriel Reid <gabriel.r...@gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1 to release. I ran the same checks and ran into the same issues as
> >> > > with the HBase-0.98 variant, which I'm reposting below for
> >> > > completeness.
> >> > >
> >> > > * Verified the checksums and signatures, they all match up, but I
> >> > > noticed that they were created differently (using gpg2) than
> previous
> >> > > releases. The format that the checksums are written in here makes it
> >> > > impossible to check them with an automated tool, which is a bit of
> an
> >> > > issue for me and perhaps a bigger issue for people who count on that
> >> > > working for all software downloads. Any reason for the change?
> >> > > * I successfully ran the full integration test suite, although it
> took
> >> > > a few tries due to failures on
> >> > > org.apache.phoenix.pherf.ResultTest#testMonitorResult. I've logged
> >> > > this in JIRA (PHOENIX-1963)
> >> > > * I successfully ran rat, although initially ran into some issues
> with
> >> > > artifacts that were left over from the previous build and not
> cleaned
> >> > > up by 'mvn clean', logged in PHOENIX-1964
> >> > > * I attempted to verify that the contents of the tag
> >> > > (v4.4.0-HBase-0.98-rc1) are identical to the contents of the source
> >> > > distribution, and noticed that they aren't -- the make_rc.sh script
> is
> >> > > different between these two (it includes among other things the
> >> > > changed checksum calculation). This isn't enough to sink this build,
> >> > > but it's something we should try to avoid in the future.
> >> > >
> >> > > - Gabriel
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:41 AM, rajeshb...@apache.org
> >> > > <chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Hi Everyone,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1.
> This
> >> > is
> >> > > the
> >> > > > next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 1.0(branch of
> >> > > > Apache HBase(1.0.1+) . The release includes both a source-only
> >> release
> >> > > and a
> >> > > > convenience binary release.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release has feature parity with our pending
> >> > > > 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 release.  New features include:
> >> > > > - Support HBase HA Query(timeline-consistent region replica
> read)[1]
> >> > > > - Alter session query support(at present changing query
> consistency
> >> > > level.
> >> > > > Can be used for changing connection properties.)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be
> found
> >> at:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0-rc1/src/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The binary artifacts can be found at:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0-rc1/bin/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~rajeshbabu/E3A65DBC.asc
> >> > > >
> >> > > > KEYS file available here:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The hash and tag to be voted upon:
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commit;h=09d1840876d7b55e32d753b6666541eb7df22b85
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v4.4.0-HBase-1.0-rc1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > The Apache Phoenix Team
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1683
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to