Yes, for now. I know that there are some problems using the JDBC driver with Oracle (see #128).
I could put a note in our test plan to check Phoenix with the JDBC driver. It'd be even better if one of y'all could sign up to do the testing. We'll have a plan together monday. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Pull #178 is only the existing JDBC driver with additional dependencies in > the POM, support files, and a different connect string, right? > > What more/different might it be than the existing JDBC driver? I'm thinking > of anything other than vanilla JDBC that Pherf might do. > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > The YCSB community is reawakening, and we're prepping to start regular > > releases again. The first of these is hitting feature freeze on Monday > June > > 15th. > > > > There's an old PR for adding Phoenix support[1], but it has > unsurprisingly > > gone stale during YCSB's long hiatus. I'd like to get Phoenix support in > > sooner rather than later. We're aiming at monthly releases, so this > coming > > Monday isn't a hard deadline. > > > > Any chance someone from the Phoenix community could take a look? > > > > [1]: https://github.com/brianfrankcooper/YCSB/pull/178 > > > > -- > > Sean > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Sean
