> I'll still put up patches for review etc.
Ok, sounds good. We'll hold you to it :-)

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I did 'less pom.xml' and found a POM in the project root with
> 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT, then switched away to another branch, then switched back to
> master upon receiving your previous mail, checked again, and its
> 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT. I'm totally lost, hence my pledge to you all that I won't
> commit here. (smile) Too far behind the times.
>
> > We value your input
>
> I'll still put up patches for review etc. Sorry that wasn't clear.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:32 AM, James Taylor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Andrew,
> > Please advise if you think we should be doing something differently. We
> > value your input. Do your poms in master have a 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT version in
> > them?
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, I give up. I will refrain from committing here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:26 AM, James Taylor <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The pom(s) for master should be 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT, but it looks like
> > that's
> > > > what they are (at least in my local version of master).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Pardon for bringing up again something I suspect others have
> already
> > > > > struggled with.
> > > > >
> > > > > The POMs in master branch carry the version 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT. The
> POMs
> > > > > in 4.x-HBase-0.98 branch carry the version
> 4.5.0-HBase-0.98-SNAPSHOT
> > > The
> > > > > POMs in the 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch that was apparently dropped also
> > > carried
> > > > > the version 4.5.0-HBase-1.1-SNAPSHOT.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where is the 4.5.0.... version for HBase 1.1 and up? I guess this
> > will
> > > be
> > > > > branched from master at some point? Will it be cool to renumber
> > master
> > > > back
> > > > > down to 4.5.0.... when branching from master for HBase 1.1 and up?
> > > > >
> > > > > I pushed an empty ref for '4.x-HBase-1.1' so that should be dropped
> > > again
> > > > > now.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I committed one patch and it ended up being a commit storm
> because
> > at
> > > > > some
> > > > > > point a branch named "4.x-HBase-1.1" went away.  I had it as a
> > local
> > > > > > tracking branch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So where do commits for 4.x on HBase 1.1 and up go? Totally
> > confusing
> > > > > > branch situation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> Piet
> > > > Hein
> > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to