[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15118191#comment-15118191
]
Maryann Xue commented on PHOENIX-1854:
--------------------------------------
I looked into it and found that the code you pointed out was exactly a bug.
There was no double wrapping or "self-link" in the first place, but the way
this visitor handled it make it look like a cyclic link. It should stop once it
finds that the ProjectedColumnExpression has been projected from another
ProjectedColumnExpression, for the second projected column does not belong to
the projector we have in this visitor (we don't have the information of the
projectors at further levels).
The multi-level projection itself shouldn't be considered a problem for it is
logical in cases like nested derived tables. I'll check-in with a fix shortly.
> Investigate not setting ProjectedColumnExpression in TupleProjector
> expressions array
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-1854
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1854
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Maryann Xue
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>
> In implementing PHOENIX-1826, on the visit of a ProjectedColumnExpression, we
> dereference the TupleProjector expressions array and continue the visit on
> the expression. To prevent a stack overflow due to infinite recursion, we
> detect the case when the dereferenced ProjectedColumnExpression is the same
> as the expression being visited and do not continue the traversal. See FIXME
> in OrderPreservingTracker.TrackOrderPreservingExpressionVisitor:
> {code}
> @Override
> public Info visit(ProjectedColumnExpression node) {
> if (projector == null) {
> return super.visit(node);
> }
> Expression expression =
> projector.getExpressions()[node.getPosition()];
> // FIXME: prevents infinite recursion for union all in subquery,
> but
> // should a ProjectedColumnExpression be used in this case?
> Wouldn't
> // it make more sense to not create this wrapper in this case?
> if (expression == node) {
> return super.visit(node);
> }
> return expression.accept(this);
> }
> {code}
> It's possible that this wrapping is not necessary in the first place.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
