[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15118580#comment-15118580
]
Sumit Nigam commented on PHOENIX-2514:
--------------------------------------
Sorry James. I could not give it a try with 4.6 as I do not have the load set
up any more. The issue only reproduces (consistently) when number of records
are > 100K and tables are salted. Beyond this, I could not establish a clear
way to reproduce the issue. I could workaround the issue by re-writing some of
my queries.
Unable to reproduce the issue, I think we can close this bug.
Best regards,
Sumit
> Even with ORDER BY clause the LIMIT does not work correctly with salted
> tables containing many records.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2514
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.5.1
> Environment: HBase-0.98.14
> Reporter: Sumit Nigam
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: LIMIT, hbase, phoenix, salted, verify
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
> Attachments: data.zip
>
>
> A query such as SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP FROM TBL ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
> DESC LIMIT 1 does not really return the MAX(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP). The table is
> salted and has 200272 records.
> select current_timestamp from TBL order by current_timestamp desc limit 1;
> +------------------------------------------+
> | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
> +------------------------------------------+
> | 1448815328556 |
> +------------------------------------------+
> select max(current_timestamp) from TBL;
> +------------------------------------------+
> | MAX("CURRENT_TIMESTAMP") |
> +------------------------------------------+
> | 1449732792090 |
> +------------------------------------------+
> The results are different. MAX is of course, returning the right record.
> The above query is one example. There are other queries which also seem to be
> returning incorrect record with ORDER BY and LIMIT.
> Is this also correct that when there is a WHERE clause limiting the number of
> projected records, then LIMIT seems to work fine? I seem to be noticing that
> also.
> The table DDL is:
> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TBL
> (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP BIGINT NOT NULL, ID VARCHAR(96), CURR_EXDOC VARCHAR,
> CURR_CHECKSUM VARCHAR(32), SUMMARY VARCHAR,
> CONSTRAINT PK PRIMARY KEY(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, ID))
> BLOCKCACHE=FALSE, COMPRESSION=SNAPPY, SALT_BUCKETS=8
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
