Thanks for volunteering, Nick. We're trying to get an RC for 4.8 up by May
24th, so not sure a 4.7.1 is necessary. If the 4.8 RC slips, then we can
rethink IHMO.
Thanks,
James
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to bring PHOENIX-2887 to your attention. It means that Phoenix
> cannot be used from Yarn applications in a number of scenarios (see history
> around the related HBASE-11118), and is bad enough that I think it's
> reasonable justification for a patch release. We haven't done a lot of
> patch releases, I assume primarily because of a lack of committer
> bandwidth.
>
> Since I'll need this patch for my own deployment, will effectively be doing
> RM duties internally anyway. I'll volunteer to RM a 4.7.1.
>
> Do folks agree that this is bad enough for users to justify a 4.7.1
> release? Are there other BUGs we'd like to ship sooner than 4.8.0? How
> would an rc0 landing around May 30th sound? Does that compete with some
> timeline for 4.8.0? (I've not seen a timeline, but I haven't been watching
> closely either)
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
