[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15332785#comment-15332785
]
Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-2535:
----------------------------------------
Great work!.
bq. Enis Soztutar Interesting question. Do we want to publish fat shaded jars
for client or I can just skip the install phase for client and server. I don't
remember for sure, but we were discussing that it would be good to publish the
artifact for full client?
I think it will help. Some libraries are publishing fat-jars into maven which
is very convenient for users. I think we should definitely do that. Let's open
a follow up issue.
> Create shaded clients (thin + thick)
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2535
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Sergey Soldatov
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2535-1.patch, PHOENIX-2535-2.patch,
> PHOENIX-2535-3.patch, PHOENIX-2535-4.patch, PHOENIX-2535-5.patch,
> PHOENIX-2535-6.patch, PHOENIX-2535-7.patch
>
>
> Having shaded client artifacts helps greatly in minimizing the dependency
> conflicts at the run time. We are seeing more of Phoenix JDBC client being
> used in Storm topologies and other settings where guava versions become a
> problem.
> I think we can do a parallel artifact for the thick client with shaded
> dependencies and also using shaded hbase. For thin client, maybe shading
> should be the default since it is new?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
