[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15340159#comment-15340159
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2999:
---------------------------------------
Only the physical table would have a namespace associated with it, right? Views
and indexes of multi-tenant tables should all be in the same namespace as the
physical table, unless I'm missing something, [~ankit.singhal]. What's the
particular issue?
> Upgrading Multi-tenant table to map with namespace using upgradeUtil
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2999
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ankit Singhal
> Assignee: Ankit Singhal
>
> currently upgradeUtil doesn't handle multi-tenant table with tenant views
> properly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
