[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15353320#comment-15353320
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-2990:
-------------------------------------
Oh, ok. I can hold off on updating the website until after 4.8 goes out. Thanks
James.
> Ensure documentation on "time/date" datatypes/functions acknowledge lack of
> JDBC compliance
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2990
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2990.diff
>
>
> In talking with [~speleato] about some differences in test cases between the
> thick and thin driver and DATE/TIMESTAMP datatypes, Sergio asked me if the
> docs were accurate on the Phoenix website about this.
> Taking a look at Data Types and Functions documentation, we don't outwardly
> warn users that these are not 100% compliant with the JDBC APIs.
> We do have the issue tracked in JIRA in PHOENIX-868 (and more, i'm sure), but
> it would be good to make sure the website is also forward in warning users.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
