[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-2990:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: PHOENIX-2990.002.diff

> Ensure documentation on "time/date" datatypes/functions acknowledge lack of 
> JDBC compliance
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>             Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2990.002.diff, PHOENIX-2990.diff
>
>
> In talking with [~speleato] about some differences in test cases between the 
> thick and thin driver and DATE/TIMESTAMP datatypes, Sergio asked me if the 
> docs were accurate on the Phoenix website about this.
> Taking a look at Data Types and Functions documentation, we don't outwardly 
> warn users that these are not 100% compliant with the JDBC APIs.
> We do have the issue tracked in JIRA in PHOENIX-868 (and more, i'm sure), but 
> it would be good to make sure the website is also forward in warning users.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to