[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-2990: -------------------------------- Attachment: PHOENIX-2990.002.diff > Ensure documentation on "time/date" datatypes/functions acknowledge lack of > JDBC compliance > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-2990 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2990 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Josh Elser > Assignee: Josh Elser > Fix For: 4.8.0 > > Attachments: PHOENIX-2990.002.diff, PHOENIX-2990.diff > > > In talking with [~speleato] about some differences in test cases between the > thick and thin driver and DATE/TIMESTAMP datatypes, Sergio asked me if the > docs were accurate on the Phoenix website about this. > Taking a look at Data Types and Functions documentation, we don't outwardly > warn users that these are not 100% compliant with the JDBC APIs. > We do have the issue tracked in JIRA in PHOENIX-868 (and more, i'm sure), but > it would be good to make sure the website is also forward in warning users. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)