OK... If you guys agree, I'll volunteer, and shoot for a 4.9 (or 4.8.1, or 5.0,
whatever we decide to name it) release one month after 4.8.(The one
complicating factor... I will be traveling a bit this coming month).
-- Lars
From: James Taylor <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Cc: Ankit Singhal <[email protected]>; Samarth Jain
<[email protected]>; Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla
<[email protected]>; Thomas D'Silva <[email protected]>;
Mujtaba Chohan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
If we could manage it this way, that'd be great, Lars. If you're up for
being the RM for 4.9, that'd be much appreciated.
Thanks,
James
On Saturday, July 2, 2016, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This reminds me a bit of the HBase times before we went to a more or less
> strict monthly release train.
> It was harder to stabilize a release and there were lots of last minutes
> changes and fixes, just because each release was big (in terms of the
> number of changes).In addition folks were worried when the next release
> would come about and would push many changes towards the end of the release
> cycle.
>
> Most of that stopped with the monthly releases. Commit rates are more
> even, there's no last minute flurry of changes (after all, the next release
> is just a month away).Users get more frequent release, each with less
> change and less risk, and they get bug fixes earlier.
>
> 4.7 was about 4 months ago, 4.6 was about 4 months before that.For my
> (personal) taste that is fairly infrequent and the release are too big and
> too hard to stabilize - again just my personal opinion, please do not take
> this in a negative way.
>
> Any interest in going to smaller and more frequent releases in Phoenix?
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> Thanks.
> -- Lars
>
> (If it helps I'll offer to RM a few releases. In that case I'd adhere to a
> monthly release train; whatever change or feature is ready gets on the
> train, what's not ready waits for the next train to arrive a month later.)
> From: James Taylor <[email protected] <javascript:;>>
> To: "[email protected] <javascript:;>" <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>>; Ankit Singhal <[email protected] <javascript:;>>; Samarth
> Jain <[email protected] <javascript:;>>; Rajeshbabu
> Chintaguntla <[email protected] <javascript:;>>; Thomas
> D'Silva <[email protected] <javascript:;>>; Mujtaba Chohan <
> [email protected] <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 2:02 PM
> Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
>
> How we looking for the RC?
>
> On Friday, July 1, 2016, Samarth Jain <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > PHOENIX-2724 has a workaround in PHOENIX-3040 that I have checked in. I
> > think we can fix PHOENIX-2724 in a patch release, if needed.
> >
> > The remaining outstanding JIRAs that I know of are:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-29
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2902>99
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > PHOENIX-3037 (Andy just committed) needs to get in.
> > > -- Lars
> > > From: Samarth Jain <[email protected] <javascript:;>
> <javascript:;>>
> > > To: dev <[email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Cc: Ankit Singhal <[email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: where are we at with the RC?
> > >
> > > PHOENIX-3028 is in. PHOENIX-2724 is a blocker as of now. Will work on
> > this
> > > today to see if it is just a matter of tuning phoenix config or
> something
> > > more.
> > > If time permits, I would like to opportunistically get PHOENIX-3035 in.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:56 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]
> <javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What are the outstanding JIRAs? Would it be possible to update this
> > daily
> > > > so we can zero in on getting an RC up? If folks could commit there
> > > > outstanding patches (or find a committer to do it for you), that be
> > much
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
