[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3128:
----------------------------------
Attachment: PHOENIX-3128_v5.patch
Patch that passes all but one test, DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testDistinct(), with
this failure:
{code}
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<4> but was:<0>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
at
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testCount(DistinctPrefixFilterIT.java:353)
at
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testCommonDistinct(DistinctPrefixFilterIT.java:273)
at
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testDistinct(DistinctPrefixFilterIT.java:260)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
at
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:48)
at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:459)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:675)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:382)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:192)
{code}
> Remove extraneous operations during upsert with local immutable index
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3128
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3128
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Junegunn Choi
> Assignee: Junegunn Choi
> Fix For: 4.8.1
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-3128.patch, PHOENIX-3128_v2.patch,
> PHOENIX-3128_v3.patch, PHOENIX-3128_v4.patch, PHOENIX-3128_v5.patch,
> PHOENIX-3128_wip.patch
>
>
> Upsert to a table with a local immutable index is supposed to be more
> efficient than to a table with a local mutable index, but it's actually
> slower (in our environment by 30%) due to extraneous operations involved.
> The problem is twofold:
> 1. Client unnecessarily prepares and sends index update.
> 2. Index cleanup is done regardless of the immutability of the table.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
