[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15563616#comment-15563616
]
Maryann Xue commented on PHOENIX-3359:
--------------------------------------
Definitely we are not to use the same objects for each occurrence. It's just I
didn't realize both the connection object and the statement object are needed.
Anyway, can you show an example? I'd like to see why a PhoenixStatement
instance is needed.
> Update JDBC urls to match connection type
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3359
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Eric Lomore
> Assignee: Eric Lomore
>
> Connection's that are intended to be unwrapped into PhoenixConnection's need
> to be created using the old JDBC url,
> {{DriverManager.getConnection(getOldUrl())}}
> {{PhoenixConnection pc = conn.unwrap(PhoenixConnection.class);}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
