[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15788006#comment-15788006
 ] 

Jeremy Huffman commented on PHOENIX-3547:
-----------------------------------------

A use case is documented in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3550 
. The alternative to that method (using tenant views) would be to use a 
non-tenant table and create the views in the global context. That works today, 
but since I logically have multiple tenants in my application layer I'll 
eventually overrun the VIEW_INDEX_ID. 

> Promote CATALOG.VIEW_INDEX_ID to an int
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3547
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3547
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Jeremy Huffman
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Increase the size of CATALOG.VIEW_INDEX_ID from smallint to int to support a 
> large number of indexed views on a single table.
> Per James: "The code would just need to be tolerant when reading the data if 
> the length is two byte short versus four byte int. At write time, we'd just 
> always write an int."
> See: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/22849e4fc73452cee3bea763cf6d5af7164dedcb44573ba6b9f452a2@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to