That is correct. Renew lease feature is available starting Phoenix 4.7.0+ and HBase 1.1.3+. Youngwoo, it would be great if you can provide us stacktraces of the timeout exceptions you are seeing.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:37 AM, James Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > It should not be necessary to increase the RPC timeout when dropping an > index with the renew lease changes we made (Phoenix 4.7.0+ and HBase > 1.1.3+). If it still is, please file a JIRA. > > Samarth - can you confirm the version requirements? > > Also - take a look at PHOENIX-3262. It'd be an interesting approach to > dropping a local index. > > Thanks, > James > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:25 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Dropping local index index issues scan and in the coprocessors we prepare > > index data and write back to same table. To avoid the timeout you can > > increase scanner timeout/rpc timeout and phoenix client timeout values as > > well. > > > > If you have many guideposts then we might issue many parallel scans to > the > > same RS which might have added lot of overhead. > > Try dropping the index with less number of guideposts on the table. > > > > Actually during major compaction we can automatically skip writing back > the > > deleted index details so we can just drop meta data. I am checking this > > improvement. Raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3566 > for > > the same. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:16 PM, 김영우 (YoungWoo Kim) <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've faced crash of RS when I'm dropping local index from very large > > table. > > > I have several tables with billions of row and the tables are hosted on > > > HBase 1.2.4 and Phoenix 4.9.0 > > > > > > Each region server reported 'gc pause' from their logs and it's strange > > to > > > me because, the log messages are popped up when I drop local indexes. > > > eventually, my query failed with timeout. any other operations like > > > insert/bulkload data or querying data works fine. > > > > > > I'm not sure but dropping local indexes from large table is expensive. > Is > > > there any workaround for this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Youngwoo > > > > > >
