[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830958#comment-15830958
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3607:
---------------------------------------
[~elserj] - [~gjacoby] summarized the choices really well here[1]. Any opinion?
Would it be better to just remove the User from the hashCode and equals of
ConnectionInfo all together?
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3607?focusedCommentId=15828822&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15828822
> Change hashCode calculation for caching ConnectionQueryServicesImpls
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3607
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3607
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.8.0, 4.9.0
> Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
> Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>
> PhoenixDriver maintains a cache of ConnectionInfo ->
> ConnectionQueryServicesImpl (each of which holds a single HConnection) :
> The hash code of ConnectionInfo in part uses the hash code of its HBase User
> object, which uses the *identity hash* of the Subject allocated at login.
> There are concerns about the stability of this hashcode. When we log out and
> log in after TGT refresh, will we have a new Subject?
> To be defensive, we should do a hash of the string returned by user.getName()
> instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
