[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15838111#comment-15838111
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3218:
-------------------------------------
bq. Is this doc the right place to say this? Seems like it would be kind of
hidden here. The Grammar page mentions commits kind of off-handedly, as does
the Atomic Upsert page.
Ignoring the transaction feature (as that is "standard"), when I first started
poking at Phoenix, I was rather confused at the "overloading" of the
{{commit()}} method to control shipping of edits to HBase. IMO, since you are
bringing how up batching works, I figured it would be a good idea to at least
nod to this point.
---
(and even though you didn't explicitly ask me about these..)
bq. Similar question—what's a more reliable way to determine cache update
frequency?
I think 15mins is a fine value -- my suggestion was just to use stronger
language in stating it.
> First draft of Phoenix Tuning Guide
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3218
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3218
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Peter Conrad
> Attachments: Phoenix-Tuning-Guide-20170110.md,
> Phoenix-Tuning-Guide.md, Phoenix-Tuning-Guide.md
>
>
> Here's a first draft of a Tuning Guide for Phoenix performance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
