[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16016719#comment-16016719
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-3744:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12868832/PHOENIX-3744.patch
  against master branch at commit 21fb0b31b46da3b7cc27265467d83a1b4cd5c5c5.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12868832

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool appears to have generated 
49 warning messages.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 11 release 
audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +      " FIELD1 VARCHAR NOT NULL , FIELD2 VARCHAR , FIELD3 INTEGER 
CONSTRAINT pk PRIMARY KEY (FIELD1 ))";
+    
PhoenixMapReduceUtil.setInput(job,PhoenixIndexDBWritable.class,SNAPSHOT_NAME,tableName,tmpDir,
 null, FIELD1, FIELD2, FIELD3);
+    
PhoenixMapReduceUtil.setInput(job,PhoenixIndexDBWritable.class,SNAPSHOT_NAME,tableName,tmpDir,
 FIELD3 + " > 0001", FIELD1, FIELD2, FIELD3);
+    
PhoenixMapReduceUtil.setInput(job,PhoenixIndexDBWritable.class,SNAPSHOT_NAME,tableName,tmpDir,inputQuery);
+  private void configureJob(Job job, String tableName, String inputQuery, 
String condition) throws Exception {
+      ResultSet rs = DriverManager.getConnection(getUrl(), 
props).createStatement().executeQuery(inputQuery);
+      assertFalse("Should only have stored" + result.size() + "rows in the 
table for the timestamp!", rs.next());
+  private void upsertData(PreparedStatement stmt, String field1, String 
field2, int field3) throws SQLException {
+  public static class TableSnapshotMapper extends Mapper<NullWritable, 
PhoenixIndexDBWritable, ImmutableBytesWritable, NullWritable> {
+        RegionScannerFactory regionScannerFactory = new 
NonAggregateRegionScannerFactory(context, useNewValueColumnQualifier, 
encodingScheme);

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     
./phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.ArrayIT

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/880//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/880//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Javadoc warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/880//artifact/patchprocess/patchJavadocWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/880//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Support snapshot scanners for MR-based queries
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3744
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3744
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Akshita Malhotra
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3744.patch
>
>
> HBase support scanning over snapshots, with a SnapshotScanner that accesses 
> the region directly in HDFS. We should make sure that Phoenix can support 
> that.
> Not sure how we'd want to decide when to run a query over a snapshot. Some 
> ideas:
> - if there's an SCN set (i.e. the query is running at a point in time in the 
> past)
> - if the memstore is empty
> - if the query is being run at a timestamp earlier than any memstore data
> - as a config option on the table
> - as a query hint
> - based on some kind of optimizer rule (i.e. based on estimated # of bytes 
> that will be scanned)
> Phoenix typically runs a query at the timestamp at which it was compiled. Any 
> data committed after this time should not be seen while a query is running.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to