[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16086359#comment-16086359
 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3995:
---------------------------------------

To support this, I believe now that we've got a reasonable way of isolating the 
config used for UPSERT SELECT with PHOENIX-3994, all that is required is to
- update PhoenixRpcScheduler with a new queue for UPSERT SELECT at a priority 
between normal and the index priority.
- create a new UpsertSelectRpcControllerFactory factory that uses the new 
priority
- set the controller factory in the upsertSelectConfig we've setup in 
UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver

Does that cover it, [~samarthjain]?

> Use medium priority for UPSERT SELECT distributed across cluster
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3995
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3995
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Samarth Jain
>
> An UPSERT SELECT that is running on the server-side should use a medium 
> priority (lower than index priority but higher than normal priority) to 
> prevent deadlocks. If we use the index priority, then there's a danger of 
> deadlocks occurring if the table being upserted into also as indexes (as the 
> index updates would be processed at the index priority).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to