[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16106705#comment-16106705
 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4053:
---------------------------------------

Looks like HBASE-17210 isn't available in 1.3. I could potentially hack around 
it by putting LockManager in the org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc package, adding 
some casts, and referencing deadline directly like this:
{code}
            RpcServer.Call call = (RpcServer.Call)RpcServer.getCurrentCall();
            if (call != null && call.deadline < Long.MAX_VALUE) {
              int timeToDeadline = (int)(call.deadline - 
System.currentTimeMillis());
              if (timeToDeadline <= this.rowLockWaitDuration) {
                reachDeadlineFirst = true;
                timeout = timeToDeadline;
              }
            }
{code}
WDYT, [~apurtell]? Too ugly, wait for 1.4 release for Phoenix, or is this ok?

> Lock row exclusively when necessary for mutable secondary indexing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4053
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4053_4.x-HBase-0.98_v2.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4053_4.x-HBase-0.98_v3.patch, PHOENIX-4053-4.x-HBase-0.98_v4.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4053_v2.patch, PHOENIX-4053_v3.patch, PHOENIX-4053_v4.patch, 
> PHOENIX-4053_wip.patch
>
>
> From HBase 1.2 on, rows are not exclusively locked when the preBatchMutate 
> call is made (see HBASE-18474). The mutable secondary index (global and 
> local) depend on this to get a consistent snapshot of a row between the point 
> when the current row value is looked up, and when the new row is written, 
> until the mvcc is advanced. Otherwise, a subsequent update to a row may not 
> see the current row state. Even with pre HBase 1.2 releases, the lock isn't 
> held long enough for us. We need to hold the locks from the start of the 
> preBatchMutate (when we read the data table to get the prior row values) 
> until the mvcc is advanced (beginning of postBatchMutateIndispensably).
> Given the above, it's best if Phoenix manages the row locking itself 
> (mimicing the current HBase mechanism).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to