[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16141303#comment-16141303
 ] 

Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-3953:
---------------------------------------

Thanks for the patch, [~jamestaylor]. I have a couple of comments:

- With this patch, we are setting the index_disable_timestamp to 0 when the the 
major compaction is running for the *index* table. I think we would need to do 
the same when major compaction is running on the data table too. I am not too 
sure what would happen if major compaction runs on a disabled index. It may or 
may not be ok. But definitely, major compaction running on a data table when a 
global mutable index on it is disabled is not good.

- I am not too sure if adding this logic to stats collection is the best 
choice. In fact, I was planning on filing a JIRA where we can have a config 
which controls whether we should be collecting stats for tables via major 
compaction. I think it would make sense to just refactor this logic in its own 
method and call it in the preCompactHook of UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver.

> Clear INDEX_DISABLED_TIMESTAMP and disable index on compaction
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3953
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3953
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: James Taylor
>              Labels: globalMutableSecondaryIndex
>             Fix For: 4.12.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-3953.patch
>
>
> To guard against a compaction occurring (which would potentially clear delete 
> markers and puts that the partial index rebuild process counts on to properly 
> catch up an index with the data table), we should clear the 
> INDEX_DISABLED_TIMESTAMP and mark the index as disabled. This could be done 
> in the post compaction coprocessor hook. At this point, a manual rebuild of 
> the index would be required.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to