[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181651#comment-16181651
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4225:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12889160/PHOENIX-4225-1.patch
  against master branch at commit 5d9572736a991f19121477a0822d4b8bf26b4c69.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12889160

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines 
longer than 100:
    +        TenantCacheImpl cache = new TenantCacheImpl(memoryManager, 
maxServerCacheTimeToLive, ticker);
+        TenantCacheImpl cache = new TenantCacheImpl(memoryManager, 
maxServerCacheTimeToLive, ticker);

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1485//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/1485//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Using Google cache may lead to lock up on RS side. 
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4225
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Sergey Soldatov
>            Assignee: Sergey Soldatov
>             Fix For: 4.12.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4225-1.patch
>
>
> On the server side we are using google cache with life time bounds. This is 
> integrated with GlobalMemoryManager which is used for almost all tasks that 
> requires memory allocation. The problem is that when the cache member get 
> removed, it doesn't send remove notification until next write/get operation 
> happen. But in some cases once the large cache was removed (but memory 
> manager doesn't know that since it relies on the notification), we try to 
> resend it and memory manager get stuck waiting for free space, blocking all 
> other operations with the memory manager.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to