[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16412247#comment-16412247
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4278:
---------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-4.x-HBase-0.98 #1842 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Phoenix-4.x-HBase-0.98/1842/])
PHOENIX-4278 Implement pure client side transactional index maintenance
(jtaylor: rev 514f576c1528df43654362bd1519f4a2082ab80f)
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/test/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/TenantCacheTest.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/index/ImmutableIndexIT.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/index/PhoenixTransactionalIndexer.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/hbase/index/covered/LocalTableState.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/IndexMetaDataCache.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/MetaDataRegionObserver.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/jdbc/PhoenixDatabaseMetaData.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/UpsertCompiler.java
* (add)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/execute/PhoenixTxnIndexMutationGenerator.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/index/BaseIndexIT.java
* (edit) phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/schema/PTableImpl.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/ServerCachingEndpointImpl.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/hbase/index/covered/TableState.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/execute/MutationState.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/mapreduce/index/PhoenixIndexPartialBuildMapper.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/generated/ServerCachingProtos.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/ServerCacheClient.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/query/ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.java
* (edit) phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/HashCache.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/ServerCachingProtocol.java
* (edit) phoenix-protocol/src/main/ServerCachingService.proto
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/index/IndexMetaDataCacheFactory.java
* (edit) phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/TenantCache.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/TenantCacheImpl.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/index/PhoenixIndexMetaData.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/join/HashCacheFactory.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/compile/DeleteCompiler.java
* (edit)
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/index/PhoenixIndexCodec.java
> Implement pure client side transactional index maintenance
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4278
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4278
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Ohad Shacham
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.14.0, 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4278.4.x-HBase-1.3.v1.patch,
> PHOENIX-4278_5.x-HBase-2.0.patch, PHOENIX-4278_addendum1.patch,
> PHOENIX-4278_v2.patch
>
>
> The index maintenance for transactions follows the same model as non
> transactional tables - coprocessor based on data table updates that looks up
> previous row value to perform maintenance. This is necessary for non
> transactional tables to ensure the rows are locked so that a consistent view
> may be obtained. However, for transactional tables, the time stamp oracle
> ensures uniqueness of time stamps (via transaction IDs) and the filtering
> handles a scan seeing the "true" last committed value for a row. Thus,
> there's no hard dependency to perform this on the server side.
> Moving the index maintenance to the client side would prevent any RS->RS RPC
> calls (which have proved to be troublesome for HBase). It would require
> returning more data to the client (i.e. the prior row value), but this seems
> like a reasonable tradeoff.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
