[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478167#comment-16478167
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4666:
-----------------------------------------
Github user ortutay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/298#discussion_r188783687
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/cache/TenantCacheImpl.java ---
@@ -77,57 +153,164 @@ public MemoryManager getMemoryManager() {
return memoryManager;
}
- private Cache<ImmutableBytesPtr,Closeable> getServerCaches() {
+ private Cache<ImmutableBytesPtr,CacheEntry> getServerCaches() {
/* Delay creation of this map until it's needed */
if (serverCaches == null) {
synchronized(this) {
if (serverCaches == null) {
- serverCaches = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
- .expireAfterAccess(maxTimeToLiveMs,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
- .ticker(getTicker())
- .removalListener(new
RemovalListener<ImmutableBytesPtr, Closeable>(){
- @Override
- public void
onRemoval(RemovalNotification<ImmutableBytesPtr, Closeable> notification) {
-
Closeables.closeAllQuietly(Collections.singletonList(notification.getValue()));
- }
- })
- .build();
+ serverCaches = buildCache(maxTimeToLiveMs, false);
}
}
}
return serverCaches;
}
+
+ private Cache<ImmutableBytesPtr,CacheEntry>
getPersistentServerCaches() {
+ /* Delay creation of this map until it's needed */
+ if (persistentServerCaches == null) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ if (persistentServerCaches == null) {
+ persistentServerCaches =
buildCache(maxPersistenceTimeToLiveMs, true);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return persistentServerCaches;
+ }
+
+ private Cache<ImmutableBytesPtr, CacheEntry> buildCache(final int ttl,
final boolean isPersistent) {
+ return CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
+ .expireAfterAccess(ttl, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
+ .ticker(getTicker())
+ .removalListener(new RemovalListener<ImmutableBytesPtr,
CacheEntry>(){
+ @Override
+ public void
onRemoval(RemovalNotification<ImmutableBytesPtr, CacheEntry> notification) {
+ if (isPersistent ||
!notification.getValue().getUsePersistentCache()) {
+
Closeables.closeAllQuietly(Collections.singletonList(notification.getValue()));
--- End diff --
Fixed it here. FWIW some files mix tabs / spaces
> Add a subquery cache that persists beyond the life of a query
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4666
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4666
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marcell Ortutay
> Assignee: Marcell Ortutay
> Priority: Major
>
> The user list thread for additional context is here:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e62a6f5d79bdf7cd238ea79aed8886816d21224d12b0f1fe9b6bb075@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E]
> ----
> A Phoenix query may contain expensive subqueries, and moreover those
> expensive subqueries may be used across multiple different queries. While
> whole result caching is possible at the application level, it is not possible
> to cache subresults in the application. This can cause bad performance for
> queries in which the subquery is the most expensive part of the query, and
> the application is powerless to do anything at the query level. It would be
> good if Phoenix provided a way to cache subquery results, as it would provide
> a significant performance gain.
> An illustrative example:
> SELECT * FROM table1 JOIN (SELECT id_1 FROM large_table WHERE x = 10)
> expensive_result ON table1.id_1 = expensive_result.id_2 AND table1.id_1 =
> \{id}
> In this case, the subquery "expensive_result" is expensive to compute, but it
> doesn't change between queries. The rest of the query does because of the
> \{id} parameter. This means the application can't cache it, but it would be
> good if there was a way to cache expensive_result.
> Note that there is currently a coprocessor based "server cache", but the data
> in this "cache" is not persisted across queries. It is deleted after a TTL
> expires (30sec by default), or when the query completes.
> This is issue is fairly high priority for us at 23andMe and we'd be happy to
> provide a patch with some guidance from Phoenix maintainers. We are currently
> putting together a design document for a solution, and we'll post it to this
> Jira ticket for review in a few days.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
