You're right, Josh, I was mistaken, there was indeed a 5.0.0 release. But I meant the same as your last bit - branch off 5.0.0 and only put in HBase 2.0.2 and critical fixes for 5.0.1.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:40 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > No, Vincent, that is wrong. There *was* a 5.0.0-alpha release. Then, > there was a 5.0.0 release (not called alpha). > > To Thomas' original question: I don't think we need to keep 4.15 in > lock-step with 5.x, but if 5.x isn't ready for release for the same > reason 4.15 is not ready for release, then we should hold off on another > 5.x (from the master branch). > > In a similar vein, we could also branch off of the 5.0.0 release and > cherry-pick back critical changes to make a proper 5.0.1 if a 5.1.0 is > still a ways off (as above) > > On 9/26/18 6:18 PM, Vincent Poon wrote: > > The 5.0.0 release apparently was an 'alpha'. I think we should do a > 5.0.1 > > which can work with HBase 2.0.2 and remove the 'alpha'. > > 5.0 has feature parity with 4.14. > > 5.1 would have feature parity with 4.15, the main addition being > splittable > > syscat > > > > On a sidenote, I've been planning a 4.14.1 release but was waiting for > the > > CDH builds. It looks like CDH branches are no longer being maintained > so I > > think I can just move forward with that. (btw we should clean those up) > > > > If noone else is doing it, I can try doing the 5.0.1 release > concurrently. > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:01 PM Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> If possible please continue to release for one or more of the HBase 1.x > >> code lines. I have a feeling the HBase 1.xes will be in production for a > >> long time yet. > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM Thomas D'Silva <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Would we also release 4.15, or just a new 5.x release to support HBase > >>> 2.0.1/2.0.2 ? PHOENIX-3534 has a few follow-up JIRAs that are needed > for > >>> splittable system catalog. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On the user@phoenix list, Francis pointed out how Phoenix 5.0.0 only > >>>> works with HBase 2.0.0 and not 2.0.1 or 2.0.2. This is pretty bad > given > >>> the > >>>> big fixes that went in since 2.0.0. > >>>> > >>>> What do folks think about a new 5.x release? Is it worthwhile to bring > >>>> back a reduced set of commits and make a 5.0.1? Or just release a > 5.1.0 > >>> and > >>>> ask people to move to that instead? > >>>> > >>>> - Josh > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Andrew > >> > >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > >> decrepit hands > >> - A23, Crosstalk > >> > > >
