Sorry for not being on top of this for a long time. I have ongoing work in my laptop for this task. Give me a couple of days so I can review non working bits and push it.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 00:45 William Shen, <wills...@marinsoftware.com> wrote: > Mahdi, > I did a little bit of mailinglist/JIRA-diving, and found the following > thread, which may be helpful to get you started in addition to the two JIRA > tickets/patches for previous work ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4956): > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Pedro Boado <pbo...@apache.org> > Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:17 PM > Subject: Re: Phoenix 5.0 + Cloudera CDH 6.0 Integration > To: <dev@phoenix.apache.org> > > > Hi Curtis, > > As far as I am aware nobody is working on it. > > The approach I followed is, starting from master: > - Change parent pom to use cloudera dependencies instead of Apache's for > compilation > - Make it compile (relatively easy for 4.x) > - Make it pass tests (not that easy) > - Once it passed, wrote the parcel module. > > There aren't a lot of code differences between cdh and base branches so I'd > try to follow the same approach - basing it on changes in the current > differences-. > > I really think this effort is needed to try to bring both branches again as > close to each other as possible. Maybe some code differences are no longer > needed because CDH is already closer to the Apache version of Hadoop 3.0 > and Hbase 2.0 than it was when I did the migration. > > Hope it helps, > Pedro. > > On 14 Sep 2018 04:57, "Curtis Howard" <curtis.james.how...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there anyone working towards Phoenix 5.0 / Cloudera (CDH) 6.0 > integration at this point? I could not find any related JIRA for this > after a quick search, and wanted to check here first before adding one. > > If I were to attempt this myself, is there a suggested approach? I can see > from previous 4.x-cdh5.* branches supporting these releases that the > changes for PHOENIX-4372 ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372 > ) > move the builds to CDH dependencies - for example: > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/024f0f22a5929da6f095dc0025b8e899e2f0c47b > > Would following the pattern of that commit (or attempting a cherry-pick) > onto the the v5.0.0-HBase-2.0 tagged release ( > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/tree/v5.0.0-HBase-2.0) be a reasonable > starting point? > > Thanks in advance > > Curtis > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:28 PM William Shen <wills...@marinsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > Same here. Would love to help with adding more CDH versions, if someone > > can help guide us on how to best go about it based on the current cdh > > branches. > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:10 PM Mahdi Salarkia <msalar...@box.com.invalid > > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> Is there a plan to release a Hbase-2.0-CDH (Cloudera 6.X) compatible > >> version of Phoenix anytime soon? > >> I can see Phoenix currently supports older versions of CDH (5.11, ...) > but > >> doesn't seem to be much work being done for the version 6. > >> P.S : I'll be happy to help given instructions to help build the CDH 6.X > >> version > >> > >> Thanks > >> Mehdi > >> > > >
