[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas D'Silva closed PHOENIX-5018.
-----------------------------------

Bulk closing jiras for the 4.14.2 relase.

> Index mutations created by UPSERT SELECT will have wrong timestamps
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5018
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.14.0, 5.0.0
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0, 4.14.2, 5.0.1
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5018.4.x-HBase-1.3.001.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5018.4.x-HBase-1.3.002.patch, PHOENIX-5018.4.x-HBase-1.4.001.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5018.4.x-HBase-1.4.002.patch, PHOENIX-5018.master.001.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5018.master.002.patch, PHOENIX-5018.master.003.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5018.master.004.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 5h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When doing a full rebuild (or initial async build) of a local or global index 
> using IndexTool and PhoenixIndexImportDirectMapper, or doing a synchronous 
> initial build of a global index using the index create DDL, we generate the 
> index mutations by using an UPSERT SELECT query from the base table to the 
> index.
> The timestamps of the mutations use the default HBase behavior, which is to 
> take the current wall clock. However, the timestamp of an index KeyValue 
> should use the timestamp of the initial KeyValue in the base table.
> Having base table and index timestamps out of sync can cause all sorts of 
> weird side effects, such as if the base table has data with an expired TTL 
> that isn't expired in the index yet. Also inserting old mutations with new 
> timestamps may overwrite the data that has been newly overwritten by the 
> regular data path during index build, which would lead to data loss and 
> inconsistency issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to