Yeah, not sure I get your concern, Thomas. We only have one website. >From the ASF Infra side, svn-pubsub (what deploys our code on SVN check-in) works the same as git-pubsub. It should just be a request to Infra to migrate the website from SVN to Git and then enable git-pubsub.
No concerns in doing this from me. Even better if you'd like to drive it, William ;) On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:24 PM William Shen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas, > > Which release line do we currently base our documentation on? Do you think > it makes sense to bring the site source into master, and always update the > site from master? > > - Will > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:46 PM Thomas D'Silva > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Currently this would not be easy to do since we have multiple branches. If > > we decide to > > implement Lars' proposal to have a single branch and a module per supported > > HBase version > > then we could have a module for the website as well. > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:03 PM swaroopa kadam <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Huge +1! > > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:38 PM William Shen <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Currently, the Phoenix site is maintained in and built from SVN > > > > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/phoenix/site>. Not sure what level > > of > > > > work it would require, but does it make sense to move the source from > > svn > > > > to git, so contribution to the website can follow the same JIRA/git > > > > workflow as the rest of the project? It could also make sure changes to > > > > Phoenix code are checked in with corresponding documentation changes > > when > > > > needed. > > > > > > > > - Will > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Swaroopa Kadam > > > [image: https://]about.me/swaroopa_kadam > > > < > > > > > https://about.me/swaroopa_kadam?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api > > > > > > > > >
