It's a tough question because my instinct is to run whatever logging system
HBase uses, and that's reload4j in 2.4 and log4j2 in HBase 2.5.

But trying to have it both ways with complicated profile magic seems like
it would add a lot of complexity, likely more than it's worth.

Since log4j2 is the "future-proof" option that HBase is going to support
not just in 2.5 but in any future 2.6 or 3.0 going forward, I'm +1 for
moving to log4j2 as part of adding HBase 2.5 support.

Geoffrey

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 4:14 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> We've had a discussion
> <https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@phoenix.apache.org:2022-1:[DISCUSS]> on
> the replacement of log4j a few months ago.
> There were not a lot of replies, but based on Andrew's suggestion we've
> switched Phoenix over to reload4j as a short-term fix (as that doesn't
> require any changes by users).
>
> However, we want to support the upcoming HBase 2.5 in Phoenix 5.2
> (PHOENIX-6692), and the log4j changes have recently been backported to
> branch-2.5, meaning that HBase 2.5 no longer uses log4j1 at all.
>
> This adds some urgency to choosing a "final" solution in Phoenix.
>
> Being built on top of HBase, I propose that we simply follow HBase's lead,
> and go with log4j2, as not having to work with two logging backends is the
> easiest both for us as developers and for our users.
>
> Looking at the HBase changes, Hbase pulls in
> org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-1.2-api , which means log4j2 can also handle
> any log4j using components (hadoop, zookeeper), and a single log4j2 config
> file should be enough for the whole stack.
>
> The changes would look like something like this:
>
> - Explicitly exclude the log4j (and sl4j-logj12) libraries from all
> dependencies
> - Explicitily add the same log4j2 dependencies as HBase to phoenix-core
> (and remove reload4j)
> - Replace the log4j config file in the assembly and tests with a log4j2
> config file
> - Modify the startup scripts.
> - Add the logging libraries to the assemblies (and remove reload4j)
>
> This needs to be done in Omid, the queryserver, and perhaps in the
> connector repos as well.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Istvan
>

Reply via email to