Voting for my release: +1 (binding)
- Verified signature successfully - Successfully ran full test suite on docker with Python 2.7 and 3.5-3.10 versions. - Successfully ran dev-support/run-source-ratcheck.sh - Checked that NEWS.rst lists the relevant changes - Checked that the version in setup.py is indeed 1.2.0 - successfully ran mvn apache-rat:check from the PQS repo root directory On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:58 PM Istvan Toth <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on phoenixdb 1.2.0 RC1. > > PhoenixDB is native Python driver for accessing Phoenix via Phoenix Query > Server. > > This version contains the following improvements compared to the previous > 1.1.0 release > > - Updated test environment to support Python 3.9 and 3.10 (PHOENIX-6737) > - Fixed get_view_names() in SqlAlchemy driver (PHOENIX-6727) > - Added supports_statement_cache attribute for SqlAlchemy dialect to avoid > warnings (PHOENIX-6735) > - Re-generated the protobuf Python files with protoc 3.19 from the Avatica > 1.21 descriptors (PHOENIX-6731) > - Dropped support for Python 3.4 (PHOENIX-6731) > > The source release consists of the contents of the python-phoenixdb > directory of the phoenix-queryserver repository. > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/python-phoenixdb-1.2.0.rc0/ > > Artifacts are signed with my "CODE SIGNING KEY": > 825203A70405BC83AECF5F7D97351C1B794433C7 > > KEYS file available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS > > > The hash and tag to be voted upon: > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix-queryserver.git;a=commit;h=c1bfbdf1299a28ab6d2e25d892577aa4097db9a0 > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix-queryserver.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/python-phoenixdb-1.2.0.rc1 > > The only change compared to RC1 is adding the ASF license header to > docker-entrypoint.sh. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks, > Istvan >
