Thank you! Do you have an opinion on PHOENIX-6888 ?
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:11 PM Tanuj Khurana <tkhur...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > I will take care of backporting PHOENIX-7024 to 5.1. > > Thanks, > Tanuj > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 02:10, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > We have recently run into a paging bug, which Aron has fixed on > > PHOENIX-7109. > > However, as I tried to backport it to 5.1, I realized that PHOENIX-7024, > > which fixes similar paging issues, is also missing from 5.1. > > > > I'm looking into backporting both PHOENIX-6888 and PHOENIX-7024 to 5.1. > > It seems that PHOENIX-6888 depends on Hbase 2.3, so it would not be > > effective for HBase 2.1 and 2.2. > > Would skipping the hooks in 2.1 and 2.2 make things worse for those HBase > > versions, or would the patch simply not be effective ? > > Would backporting PHOENIX-6888 break anything else ? > > > > AFAICT, PHOENIX-7024 has no such problems, and can be backported without > > problems. > > > > What do you suggest ? > > Should we backport both patches, or just PHOENIX-7024 ? > > > > look > > > -- *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer *Email*: st...@cloudera.com cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
