Here's more details on the integration, just announced: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
On Monday, February 10, 2014, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > FYI, in case you're not following this on the general list, the INFRA guys > have been working hard to improve the Github/Apache mail integration. If > you link your Github user name with your Apache id by editing this file[1], > when you open a pull requests on the Apache Github mirror, the dev list > will get email. Comments on the pull request will go to the dev list too > (only top level comments, not line comments). Also, if the title of pull > request contains a JIRA ticket, the comment will appear in the JIRA as > well. > > Thanks, > James > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/docs/github_team.txt > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:41 PM, lars hofhansl > <la...@apache.org<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Agreed. That was kinda my point earlier. > > For a small patch/fix the least friction might be a patch to jira. Or > > maybe a contributor prefers to send a pull request on GitHub. > > > > I think we should become familiar with all options (patch, GitHub, RB), > so > > that we can be friendly to contributors. > > > > -- Lars > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > *To:* Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > *Cc:* "dev@phoenix.incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>" < > dev@phoenix.incubator.apache.org <javascript:;>>; > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org <javascript:;>>; James Taylor < > jamestay...@apache.org <javascript:;>>; > > lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2014 4:37 PM > > *Subject:* Re: best development methodology for Apache git? > > > > Good point. As long as the communication is happening efficiently, it > > doesn't really matter what mechanism is used. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I'll also suggest not requiring one method or the other. Meaning, "only > > > github pull requests" or "only review board", etc. With community > growing > > > larger, we do not want to force people in one way. It should be always > > > acceptable to attach patches to jira, and/or RB, or github. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:49 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org > > >wrote: > > > > > >> To close the loop on this, unless there's strong opposition, let's > > follow > > >> the jclouds model documented here: > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Committers%20Guide > > >> We can also reference the JIRA on check-ins as Lars mentioned before. > > >> INFRA > > >> has already enabled our Github mirror to send a notification to our > dev > > >> list when a pull request is submitted. > > >> > > >> If this becomes burdensome or we find our mirror getting behind, we > can > > >> always revisit (or add more tooling). > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> James > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > It's your party James, in my opinion. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Friday, January 31, 2014, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> The folks over at jcloud use this as their methodology: > > >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Committers%20Guide > > >> >> > > >> >> Seems reasonable to me (with my Github bias :-) > > >> >> > > >> >> Thoughts? > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:50 PM, James Taylor < > > jamestay...@apache.org > > >> >> >wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Seems like Jake said "no" by closing it the INFRA ticket. I'll > ask > > on > > >> >> the > > >> >> > general list on ideas for a development methodology similar to > > github > > >> >> and > > >> >> > mention Gerrit, but I may have already worn out my welcome by > > >> pestering > > >> >> him > > >> >> > to import our github issues. :-( > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Nick Dimiduk < > ndimi...@gmail.com> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> >> Looking again at the comments on the INFRA ticket, I think > there's > > >> >> enough > > >> >> >> interest to justify its completion. I guess it's really up to > > Jukka > > >> and > > >> >> >> Jake. > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On Thursday, January 30, 2014, James Taylor > > >> >> >> <jamestay...@apache.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > > >> >> >> jamestay...@apache.org');>> > > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Gerrit sounds ideal, but is it an option? > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > On
