I thought we needed three +1 votes from IPMC members? Or do we close this and open a new one on the general list?
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:44 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Three +1's are sufficient. Sorry I did not manage to look at it. > > > > ________________________________ > From: James Taylor <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 12:57 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 3rd Phoenix 2.2.3 release candidate is available > for download > > > So far, we have 3 +1 votes from myself, Mujtaba, and Andrew. Should we > close the vote and start a new one on the general list? Wait longer? Not > sure how to proceed, but I'd like to get this out before we release 3.0! > > Thanks, > James > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Mujtaba Chohan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The 3rd Phoenix 2.2.3 release candidate (RC2) is available for download > at > > http://people.apache.org/~mujtaba/phoenix-2.2.3RC2/ > > Signed with my code signing key: 17AF6E3F > > > > This is source and binary release. Unfortunately the last > > RC1<http://people.apache.org/~mujtaba/phoenix-2.2.3RC1/> was > > sunk due some files missing license header and containing copyright [ > > PHOENIX-45 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-45>] . > > > > Jenkins run for 2.2.3 RC2 > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Phoenix-2.2.3/5/ > > > > Please try out the new RC. It would upgrade your existing table metadata > on > > first connection. > > > > Vote +1/-1 by Feb 14 on whether we should release this as 2.2.3. > > > > Thanks, > > Mujtaba > > >
